Ukraine
-
niemeyjt
- Posts: 4920
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:34 pm
Ukraine
Meanwhile, for some, greed is just so deeply ingrained they cannot do the right thing. Hopefully, customers of such an outfit will make themselves ex-customers.
HSBC removes references to Ukraine ‘war’ from analysts’ reports
HSBC has repeatedly edited its analysts’ research publications to remove references to a “war” in Ukraine, as the UK bank resists pressure to follow rivals by closing its business in Russia.
source: https://www.ft.com/content/46d8de37-596 ... 738d078e40
HSBC removes references to Ukraine ‘war’ from analysts’ reports
HSBC has repeatedly edited its analysts’ research publications to remove references to a “war” in Ukraine, as the UK bank resists pressure to follow rivals by closing its business in Russia.
source: https://www.ft.com/content/46d8de37-596 ... 738d078e40
- DaveW
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 5:52 pm
- Location: Alpes Maritimes 06
-
exile
- Posts: 2731
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 9:57 pm
- Location: Auvergne Rhone Alpes
Ukraine
As you say, interesting but I cannot sign on to the whole narrative.
The lack of major attack on Kyiv can be attributed equally to the importance of the city to Russian history and culture as well as to its importance to Ukrainians. As such it might be viewed as being given the same status as was given to Paris and Rome in WW2.
The declared lack of attack on civilian targets seems to have missed a few significant (and probably many, many minor) incidents - the destruction of city square in Kharkiv, the destruction of the maternity hospital and the theatre in Mariupol.
There is no doubt that in the early days they avoided attack on major infrastructure targets - but mainly because they hoped for a rapid take over and wanted to use those facilities themselves I would contend.
The lack of major attack on Kyiv can be attributed equally to the importance of the city to Russian history and culture as well as to its importance to Ukrainians. As such it might be viewed as being given the same status as was given to Paris and Rome in WW2.
The declared lack of attack on civilian targets seems to have missed a few significant (and probably many, many minor) incidents - the destruction of city square in Kharkiv, the destruction of the maternity hospital and the theatre in Mariupol.
There is no doubt that in the early days they avoided attack on major infrastructure targets - but mainly because they hoped for a rapid take over and wanted to use those facilities themselves I would contend.
- Bayleaf
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:22 am
- Location: NE Dordogne
Ukraine
Who knows what sick thoughts are going through Putrid's head. Initially saying "no, not going to invade", then "it's a military exercise", "just liberating Ukraine from neo-nazism" - then changed the narrative to wanting complete control over certain cities, now implying he wants the Eastern 1/4 and split the country, and take all Port cities.
I don't think it should be called a war either - it's an invasion, by Putrid, and Ukraine are just trying to defend themselves. He's playing with them like a cat plays with a mouse. All I keep hoping for is that the Russian army continue to weaken, and down arms before more young (reluctant) soldiers die.
"War is a place where young people who don't know each other, and don't hate each other, kill each other, by the decision of old people who know each other, and hate each other, but don't kill each other..."
Erich Hartmann
I don't think it should be called a war either - it's an invasion, by Putrid, and Ukraine are just trying to defend themselves. He's playing with them like a cat plays with a mouse. All I keep hoping for is that the Russian army continue to weaken, and down arms before more young (reluctant) soldiers die.
"War is a place where young people who don't know each other, and don't hate each other, kill each other, by the decision of old people who know each other, and hate each other, but don't kill each other..."
Erich Hartmann
- Blaze
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 9:06 pm
- Location: Ille et Villaine (35)
Ukraine
There seems to be something in this.Ex-Montpellier wrote:Now this from Anthony DeRosa (WSJ) "*Russian Oligarch Roman Abramovich [&] Ukrainian Peace Negotiators Suffer Symptoms of Suspected Poisoning *Symptoms Appeared After Meeting in Kyiv Earlier This Month *Abramovich Has Shuttled Between Moscow and Kyiv as Peace Talks Continue.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60904676
"On the afternoon of 3 March, Roman Abramovich joined Russian and Ukrainian peace negotiators at talks on the Ukraine-Belarus border. What happened next is very mysterious.
Later that night, three of the delegates - including Mr Abramovich - according to the investigative website Bellingcat, suffered symptoms of nerve agent poisoning.
They had inflamed skin, irritated eyes and severe pain behind the eyes - symptoms which lasted all night.
None of them had eaten anything more, according to Bellingcat, than chocolate and water.
Chemical weapons specialists have examined this case and concluded that they believe it was an intentional use of a chemical agent.
But we have no idea who did it. There is no claim of responsibility.
Inevitably people will be wondering if this was the work of the GRU, Russia's military intelligence service, who Britain concluded was behind the Novichok Salisbury poisoning in 2018.
There has been no immediate comment from Russia and no proof they were responsible.
But somebody, it seems, wanted to send a warning to those taking part in the peace talks. This was not a lethal dose, it was a warning."
- Hotrodder
- Posts: 3371
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:31 pm
- Location: Brittany 22
Ukraine
A warning to who, one wonders. I certainly wouldn't attend one, fearing that Putin could drop a missile on the place. He's mad enough.
On my headstone it will say: Please switch off mobile phones. I'm trying to get some sleep.
