Children are judgemental as I tried to explain, they want to know why somebody is called a blackie, fat, ugly. Have you tried to explain to a child that the words aren’t hurtful, and that golliwogs aren’t just tradition but are something from a bygone age.Blaze wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 9:06 pm I was an avid reader as a child and was reading "adult" books at a young age - no, not that sort of adult bookBut I also read Dahl, Enid Blyton, Little Black Sambo, Kipling, Grimms Fairy Tales and many others, enjoyed them, and they didn't make me racist or prejudiced. Children are far more accepting, less judgemental, interested in explanations and certainly not paranoid like some adults. I remember as a child finding a copy of Struwwelpeter at one of my grandmother's and thought it was horrible, so I didn't read it. It's probably banned today.
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for today's readers?
- DaveW
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 5:52 pm
- Location: Alpes Maritimes 06
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
-
DominicBest
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 10:09 am
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
The first part of his autobiography, Boy, was sold in two versions one for children and the other for adults. Dahl himself was up to speed with what was suitable for children and what was not.
The story reminds me of an experience a friend had about 20 years ago. He took A Town Like Alice out from his local library and when he returned it the librarian asked if he’d enjoyed it. He replied, yes, it’s nice to read an honest book written as it was where the author is willing to call a spade a spade. Oh dear, the librarian responded, it sounds as though we had better take it off the shelf. He wished he’d kept his mouth shut.
The story reminds me of an experience a friend had about 20 years ago. He took A Town Like Alice out from his local library and when he returned it the librarian asked if he’d enjoyed it. He replied, yes, it’s nice to read an honest book written as it was where the author is willing to call a spade a spade. Oh dear, the librarian responded, it sounds as though we had better take it off the shelf. He wished he’d kept his mouth shut.
-
exile
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 9:57 pm
- Location: Auvergne Rhone Alpes
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
And when they have done with the Childrens books?DaveW wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 9:01 pmI think you are being taken in by the right wing press - it was books for children.exile wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 8:05 pm So:
let's ban Othello - strong undertones (and I am being kind there) of racial prejudices.
or
Scrooge - setting unrealistic expectations for the poor that they might ever eat Goose for Christmas
or
How about re-writing Mein Kampf to take out all of the nasty bits - short pamphlet I know.
There is a point where the madness has to stop
Wokism, I really hope you aren’t serious.
Sorry aimed at previous poster
- Hotrodder
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:31 pm
- Location: Brittany 22
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
The techies are working on total mind control. Watch this space.
On my headstone it will say: Please switch off mobile phones. I'm trying to get some sleep.
- Loup-garou
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2021 4:41 pm
- Location: 52 & 71
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
Some minds are likely to take less work than others.
- Blaze
- Posts: 5603
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 9:06 pm
- Location: Ille et Villaine (35)
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
When will the words "fat" "ugly" "black" "white" be removed from the dictionary ?
The word "obese" seems acceptable - should that replace "fat" ?? I am neither, but if I were, I'd rather be called "fat" than "obese".
The word "obese" seems acceptable - should that replace "fat" ?? I am neither, but if I were, I'd rather be called "fat" than "obese".
Last edited by Blaze on Tue Feb 21, 2023 2:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Polly
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:35 pm
- Location: Berkshire
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
Yes, I’d rather call a spade a spade and prefer fat to obese - which I think might be bigger than simply fat.
I do think this culling of language used by Roald Dahl is the thin end of the wedge - wokeism seems to be growing exponentially everywhere. It used to mean alert to racial prejudice and discrimination but seems to have very many tentacles now.
I do think this culling of language used by Roald Dahl is the thin end of the wedge - wokeism seems to be growing exponentially everywhere. It used to mean alert to racial prejudice and discrimination but seems to have very many tentacles now.
-
MAD87
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 7:53 am
- Location: 87520 Oradour s/Glane
- Contact:
-
tagh
- Posts: 657
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2021 1:21 pm
- Location: Pas de Calais.
-
niemeyjt
- Posts: 4920
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:34 pm
Roald Dahl's books unsuitable for modern readers?
Of course it is OK - it is now just called "trans".
